Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Sperms and Polls

Okay, as a direct face to Michael: Changing the gender of a sperm cell IS possible. It's called sperm spinning.

Michael has also manipulated the poll results by voting a total of 7 times for "Anything but Leviticus."

25 comments:

  1. "If everything made itself through natural processes—without God—then God does not own us and has no right to tell us how to live. In fact, God does not really exist in this way of thinking, so there is no absolute basis for morality. Without God, anything goes—concepts of right and wrong are just a matter of opinion. And without a basis for morality, there is no such thing as sin. And no sin means that there is no need to fear God’s judgment and there is no need for the Savior, Jesus Christ. The history in the Bible is vital for properly understanding why one needs to accept Jesus Christ."--AnswersinGenesis.org

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yep. There is no basis for morality: people have different morals, but they DO generally come up with "Don't do bad things." As some people have no morals, too.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Different morals means that they CAN'T come up with "Don't do bad things" because with different morals, they have different ideas on what's bad.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Just because something is different does not mean it can't overlap. In almost every single culture, murder was 'evil.' Of course there are the outlyers, but generally people say murder and theft are 'bad.' However, there are things that have been contested. These come up as 'controversial issues.'

    ReplyDelete
  5. you all have problems. no one is very oppen minded

    ReplyDelete
  6. On the topic of the actual post, it's a sperm-a-go-round!

    ReplyDelete
  7. murder was 'evil.'

    How did they know it was evil?

    ReplyDelete
  8. And Ryan, that's just wrong.

    Weird, the security code on this was meateat.

    ReplyDelete
  9. THere are lots of controversial issues, aren't there Chris?

    And such an example is gay people.

    And most Christians will agree that its naughty because the BIBLE says so.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You can't know if murder is evil. As said before, it is subjective. As in, you can't "know" which colour is best. You can only have your opinion. You're not seeing the picture.

    How is Ryan's post wrong? It's part of our anatomy.

    Denying gays rights is EXACTLY the same as denying blacks right except for the exchange of the word "black" for "gay." It's the way they are born. They can't help it. Can you help being a brunette? Can you help being female? What would be your opinion on something that said brunette females did not have any rights and/or could not marry? What if they could not go out in public? What if they had to be used as slaves?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hvaða tegund af manneskja sem trúir ekki á fullkomlega góðum vindmylla?

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ég vildi að ég gæti bara losna við allar þessar hræðilegur blog. Hverjum er ekki sama í raun um þessa trú / siðferði / morð efni?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Það sagði ég það. Ég er ekki alveg sama hvað þú hefur að segja í svari.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The Bible says that being gay is wrong. It says nothing about hair color, gender, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Wrong as in "that's disguisting. Wooow." Not as in "That's morally wrong."

    ReplyDelete
  16. What, no one wanted to read what I said? It was Icelandic.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I read it; I just ignored it.

    ReplyDelete
  18. LOL My security word was

    Pollsin

    Apparantly, either your poll is a sin, or the polls are in.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Okay, gays are born the way they are. Their hormones are programmed to think people of the same gender are hot, and not people of the opposite gender, as is more common. It's ridiculous to discriminate against people because of the way they're born. And people used to believe that the Bible was okay with slavery because someone's skin color defined whether or not they were right in the eyes of "God."

    ReplyDelete
  20. Which says, "The Bible was written a very long time ago. It is flawed. AND it was FOR a long time ago. So we have a writing that is flawed AND in the wrong time-period." Doh!

    ReplyDelete